Comp Plan Packages
Compensation Realignment
Starting at 13,900
Strategic redesign of revenue incentives for growth-stage companies that need alignment without full structural overhaul.
Designed for companies with:
1 to 2 revenue teams
1 to 2 regions
1 to 2 GTM motions
Minimum 5 million ARR
Clear growth goals, but misaligned incentives
This is not a cosmetic tweak. It is a clean, financially disciplined redesign grounded in strategy and unit economics.
When Compensation Is Holding You Back
You may need Compensation Realignment if:
Incentives are driving the wrong behaviors
Reps are optimizing for payout, not company strategy
Forecast accuracy is weak
Sales efficiency is slipping
Finance is uncomfortable with payout volatility
Pipeline coverage looks healthy, but revenue does not materialize
If nothing changes, the next 12 months likely look the same.
This engagement fixes the structure before the problem compounds.
What This Engagement Includes
This is a joint engagement between RevOps and Finance. Both perspectives are embedded in the design.
We assess:
Revenue goals and executive priorities
GTM motion and coverage model
Role accountability across New ARR, Expansion, and Renewals
Quota attainment patterns and payout distribution
Pipeline coverage and sales cycle dynamics
Financial constraints and board expectations
Deliverables
You receive:
A comprehensive financial modeling spreadsheet
Compensation philosophy document aligned to company strategy
Role-by-role compensation plan documentation
OTE and quota modeling scenarios
Sensitivity analysis across attainment ranges
Drafted final compensation plans ready for legal review
Optional admin or implementation support can be added if CRM or payroll configuration is required.
Outcomes
Incentives aligned to strategic revenue goals
Improved predictability and financial control
Clear linkage between behavior and payout
Reduced friction between Sales, RevOps, and Finance
Confidence in cost of sales and compensation exposure
Strategic Compensation Architecture
Starting at 19,900
Executive-level compensation architecture for complex revenue organizations.
Designed for companies with:
3 or more revenue teams
3 or more regions
Multiple GTM motions
New market expansion
Mid-year corrections
Board-level efficiency pressure
This engagement addresses structural complexity, not incremental improvement.
When the Stakes Are Higher
You may need Strategic Compensation Architecture if:
Compensation must support new market expansion
Multiple roles share deal ownership
Incentives conflict across teams
Burn multiple and sales efficiency are under scrutiny
Mid-year corrections are required
The board expects measurable improvement in revenue discipline
This is not a revision. It is structural architecture.
What This Engagement Includes
This is a fully integrated RevOps and Finance collaboration. The CFO partner is directly engaged in the majority of strategy discussions.
We evaluate:
Revenue targets across regions and motions
Cross-functional role design and deal ownership
Financial exposure and payout modeling
Expansion, renewals, and retention incentives
Administrative feasibility and reporting requirements
Change management and adoption risk
Deliverables
You receive everything included in Compensation Realignment, plus:
Advanced multi-scenario financial modeling
Legal-ready final compensation plans
Rollout strategy and executive presentation deck
Rep-facing communication materials
Structured change management plan
Leadership presentation to Sales and revenue teams
Optional admin or systems implementation support can be included if configuration in CRM or payroll systems is required.
Outcomes
Incentives aligned across teams, regions, and motions
Improved sales efficiency and cost discipline
Clear alignment between strategy, finance, and behavior
Reduced internal conflict over compensation logic
Strong executive and board confidence in incentive structure
Frequently Asked Questions
-
A sales compensation consultant evaluates your current incentive structure, financial exposure, and revenue goals, then designs compensation plans that align behavior with strategy. This includes quota design, OTE modeling, payout structures, accelerators, and financial sensitivity analysis.
-
A compensation plan redesign typically includes:
Compensation philosophy aligned to strategy
Role-by-role plan documentation
OTE and quota modeling
Financial sensitivity analysis
Drafted final compensation plans
Clear linkage between incentives and performance metrics
Strategic Compensation Architecture engagements also include rollout planning and rep-facing communication materials.
-
Most engagements run between six and eight weeks, depending on complexity, number of roles, and internal alignment requirements.
-
A well-designed compensation structure can address:
Misaligned incentives
Reps optimizing for payout instead of company goals
Overpayment relative to performance
Weak sales efficiency
Forecast unpredictability
Internal friction between Sales, RevOps, and Finance
-
Compensation Realignment is designed for companies with one to two revenue teams and limited regional or GTM complexity. It provides a clean redesign aligned to strategy and financial discipline.
Strategic Compensation Architecture is designed for companies with multiple teams, regions, or motions. It includes advanced modeling, mid-year corrections, rollout planning, and executive-level change management.
-
This is a joint RevOps and Finance engagement. Compensation design impacts both behavior and financial exposure. The CFO partner is directly involved in strategy discussions to ensure the final structure is financially sound and operationally feasible.
-
Mid-year corrections are included in the Strategic Compensation Architecture package. These situations require careful financial modeling and communication planning to minimize disruption and rep attrition risk.
-
These engagements are best suited for B2B or SaaS companies between 5 million and 50 million ARR. Very early-stage startups typically benefit more from foundational revenue design before engaging at this level.